2012 Volume 17 Issue 1
Family Science Review
Research Articles
Amanda W. Harrist, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT: The journeys of being a family science educator, researcher, and parent are arguably intertwined. This essay describes how the author has used research- and theory- based concepts to inform her instructional practice. Three interrelated instructional devices—a conceptual model, cooperative learning teams, and a class-within-a-class format—are described as they have been implemented in an undergraduate course on parent-child relations. The strength of these devices seems to lie in the way they utilize processes that also underlie effective parenting, such as synchrony, attunement, and scaffolding. The essay describes how these instructional methods play out in the classroom, as well as the ways they facilitate critical thinking processes such as complexity, flexibility, multiple perspectives, self-reflection, insightfulness, and systemic analysis.
Clifton E. Barber, Ph.D
ABSTRACT: Organized around three course objectives are six activities/assignments the author has found useful in promoting affective learning outcomes in introductory courses on aging. The intent in developing these approaches was to address particular postures toward aging and the aged often displayed by students in their late teens and early twenties. In addition to describing these activities and assignments, the author reflects on student feedback in terms of the promise these activities and assignments hold for enabling students to more clearly discern their personal futures as older adults, and for motivating them to make changes in their present lives that will ensure successful aging in the future.
Carol Anderson Darling, Ph.D., CFLE
ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper is to share some personal wisdom and six practices in the continuing process of becoming the best teacher you can be. In addition, two more suggestions are provided for one’s personal life.
Richard Feistman, MA
ABSTRACT. This reflection focuses on the career path and teaching philosophy of a family educator in the middle of his career. Varied experiences within schools and universities in multiple countries produced a teaching philosophy that revolves around the perspectives and needs of the student. The author finds that an educator can better manage the fluidity that makes families unique by fostering a safe and open learning environment, working through power hierarchies, and appreciating student context.
R. Roudi Nazarinia Roy, Ph.D. & Kelly Campbell, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT: In this paper, we narratively describe our perspectives and experiences as two female professors teaching courses on family diversity. We begin by outlining our subjectivities, including an explicit identification of the ways in which our identities are privileged versus not privileged. We then use a feminist lens to discuss the teaching goals and strategies used in our courses. The teaching goals discussed in this paper include: self-awareness of the instructor, reducing hierarchy in the classroom, empowering students, and caring for the individual student. Our strategies include: promoting dialogue, encouraging respect, and creating a class environment in which individuals feel safe enough to disagree. The paper concludes with a discussion of how instructors can use self-disclosures and personal experiences in their classes to help reduce the power hierarchy and facilitate learning. We recommend that every classroom in higher education be inclusive and respectful of diversity, which would perhaps increase the retention of all students.
Kathleen M. Galvin, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT: Life is unpredictable. Neither life nor scholarly careers play out in linear fashion; my professional trajectory developed as a balance of plodding and planning as well as seizing the moment or saying “yes” to unforeseen possibilities. This piece reveals a career trajectory built, in part, by embracing opportunities to teach or write in new areas and, eventually to participate in the creation of the field of family communication. The final section reflects some lessons learned along the way.
Robert Hughes, Jr., Ph.D.
ABSTRACT: Delivery of information and advice through the Internet has transformed the ways in which family life educators can teach about the important issues facing families. In this article I reflect on the lessons I have learned as a result of trying to use online delivery systems to conduct family life programs. These reflections highlight the opportunities and challenges faced by family life educators as they attempt to use new delivery systems and educational tools.
Soyoung Lee, Ph.D., CFLE
ABSTRACT: This article reflects on my journey as a junior faculty member and certified family life educator who teaches in the field of family science. Effective and constructive teaching is more than just delivering information to students. It is a dynamic and complex process of stimulating students’ desire to learn, facilitating their intellectual and emotional growth, and preparing them to become competent professionals. My main goal in teaching is to prepare my students to become (a) able to apply appropriate theories to research and practice in the area of family science; (b) sensitive to cultural diversity as it relates to their work; and (c) able to collaborate effectively with community members, their families, and other family professionals. In order to support each of my students’ active learning and to approach teaching in an integrative fashion, I utilize a service-learning option in teaching a course that develops skills to work with diverse families and children. More specifically, I discuss the course requirements, learning outcomes, and challenges it presents. Through a continuous journey of practicing effective and constructive teaching, I devote myself to supporting my students’ active learning and becoming a more effective teacher in family science.
Jay A. Mancini, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT: I recount my career as a family scientist through a relationship lens, describing important career paths and turning points substantially influenced by my colleagues. My self-described life of privilege in family science began with schooling in individual psychology, and experiences with youth in an adolescent psychiatric setting. My early family science career was spent as a graduate student in Kansas and in North Carolina, and continued with faculty appointments at Virginia Tech and The University of Georgia. Along the way I have collaborated with a collection of excellent family scholars, who also are equally excellent as people. This has resulted in a career centered on the resilience and vulnerabilities of families, and one enriched by relationships, connections, and networks.
Terrance D. Olson, Ph. D.
ABSTRACT: To become effective as a family life educator, I didn’t foresee the possibility of eventually rethinking the very foundations of my approach. I knew the task could not be limited to teaching about families (providing knowledge grounded in research and theory), but to teach for families (showing the roots of quality relationships and how to nourish them). But my search to understand why some people benefitted from family life classes (or from marriage and family therapy) and why some seemed immune to the knowledge I was offering led me to examine philosophy and theory more carefully. The result was a focus on something more fundamental than knowledge or skills. My starting points shifted to offering a view of what it means to be human—what humans are capable of. Our view of what it means to be human can alter our ideas of how change is possible and what the roots of fulfilling relationships are grounded in. As a consequence, I found myself more realistic and more confident about how family life education (FLE) can make a difference in the quality of relationships people long to experience.
G. Kevin Randall, Ph.D., CFLE
ABSTRACT. Parker Palmer (1998) said it well: “We did not merely find a subject to teach – the subject also found us” (p. 25). In this brief article, I want to share with others what my subject has taught my students and me. Over the past 20 years, three particular assignments or practicums, as I call them in class, have consistently earned high commendations from my undergraduate students, students whose academic majors vary across the campus from engineering and technology to liberal arts and sciences. These three assignments, focusing primarily on the family of origin, interpersonal communication, and forgiveness, are the applied backbone of the course, Family Relations, an upper-level undergraduate course.